Weed Biology and Management

585 papers and 8.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 585 papers published in Weed Biology and Management in the last decades have received a total of 8.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Weed Biology and Management usually cover Plant Science (535 papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (103 papers) and Pollution (95 papers) specifically the topics of Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (360 papers), Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (218 papers) and Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Weed Biology and Management are Katsuichiro Kobayashi, Stefano Benvenuti, Yoshiharu Fujii, Krishna N. Reddy, Kenji Usui, A. S. Raghubanshi, Gyan Prakash Sharma, Robert E. Blackshaw, Jamuna Sharan Singh and Hirofumi Yamaguchi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Weed Biology and Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Weed Biology and Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Weed Biology and Management.

Countries where authors publish in Weed Biology and Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Weed Biology and Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Weed Biology and Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Weed Biology and Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025