Acta Applicandae Mathematicae

2.5k papers and 40.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Acta Applicandae Mathematicae in the last decades have received a total of 40.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Applicandae Mathematicae usually cover Mathematical Physics (811 papers), Applied Mathematics (793 papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (549 papers) specifically the topics of Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (335 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (279 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (215 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Applicandae Mathematicae are Peter J. Olver, Jan Seidler, Derek F. Lawden, J. Gwinner, Peter Frolkovič, Themistocles M. Rassias, Jean Aubin, Neil Macdonald, Henryk Gzyl and Alain Bensoussan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Applicandae Mathematicae

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Applicandae Mathematicae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Applicandae Mathematicae.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Applicandae Mathematicae

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Applicandae Mathematicae. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Applicandae Mathematicae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Applicandae Mathematicae more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025