ACS Central Science

2.0k papers and 100.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in ACS Central Science in the last decades have received a total of 100.8k indexed citations. Papers published in ACS Central Science usually cover Molecular Biology (693 papers), Materials Chemistry (484 papers) and Organic Chemistry (361 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (115 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (106 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (91 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACS Central Science are Arumugam Manthiram, Alois Fürstner, Tomislav Friščić, Jean‐Louis Do, Gregory C. Fu, John F. Hartwig, Alán Aspuru‐Guzik, Bai Yang, Junjun Liu and Rui Li.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ACS Central Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ACS Central Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACS Central Science.

Countries where authors publish in ACS Central Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACS Central Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACS Central Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACS Central Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025