Revue Philosophique de Louvain

1.3k papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Revue Philosophique de Louvain in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Revue Philosophique de Louvain usually cover Philosophy (469 papers), Sociology and Political Science (204 papers) and Anthropology (181 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Philosophy and Thought (133 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (102 papers) and Medieval Philosophy and Theology (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revue Philosophique de Louvain are Fernand Van Steenberghen, Jean-Michel Counet, Gérard Verbeke, Antoine Guillaumont, Paul Ricœur, Pierre Destrée, Jean‐Paul Roux, André Bareau, Simon Susen and Jean Jolivet.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revue Philosophique de Louvain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revue Philosophique de Louvain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revue Philosophique de Louvain.

Countries where authors publish in Revue Philosophique de Louvain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revue Philosophique de Louvain. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revue Philosophique de Louvain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revue Philosophique de Louvain more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025