Academic Pediatrics

2.5k papers and 38.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Academic Pediatrics in the last decades have received a total of 38.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Academic Pediatrics usually cover General Health Professions (1.2k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (703 papers) and Clinical Psychology (561 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Health (564 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (329 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (294 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Academic Pediatrics are Robert B. Penfold, Fang Zhang, Neal Halfon, Rita Mangione‐Smith, Ruth E. K. Stein, C. Cybele Raver, Clancy Blair, Kandyce Larson, Christina Bethell and Christopher Wimer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Academic Pediatrics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Academic Pediatrics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Academic Pediatrics.

Countries where authors publish in Academic Pediatrics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Academic Pediatrics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Academic Pediatrics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Academic Pediatrics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025