Animal Bioscience

904 papers and 5.5k indexed citations

About

The 904 papers published in Animal Bioscience in the last decades have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Animal Bioscience usually cover Animal Science and Zoology (458 papers), Genetics (204 papers) and Molecular Biology (199 papers) specifically the topics of Animal Nutrition and Physiology (324 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (164 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (148 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Animal Bioscience are Motoi Kikusato, Sung Woo Kim, Marcos Elias Duarte, Yoo Yong Kim, Metha Wanapat, In Ho Kim, Anuraga Jayanegara, Beob Gyun Kim, Muhammad Umar Yaqoob and Minqi Wang.

In The Last Decade

Animal Bioscience

774 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Countries where authors publish in Animal Bioscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Animal Bioscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Animal Bioscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Animal Bioscience more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Animal Bioscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Animal Bioscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Animal Bioscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026