Countries where authors publish in Innate Immunity
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Innate Immunity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Innate Immunity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Innate Immunity more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Innate Immunity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Innate Immunity.
About Innate Immunity
The 883 papers published in Innate Immunity in the last decades have received a total of 20.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Innate Immunity usually cover Immunology (536 papers), Microbiology (91 papers), Cancer Research (86 papers), Periodontics (23 papers) and Epidemiology (151 papers) specifically the topics of Immune Response and Inflammation (301 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (102 papers), Immune cells in cancer (74 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (67 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (51 papers), interferon and immune responses (44 papers), Inflammasome and immune disorders (43 papers) and Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Innate Immunity are Arosh S. Perera Molligoda Arachchige, Kevan L. Hartshorn, Jennifer R. Powell, Frederick M. Ausubel, Dipika Gupta, Shweta Tripathi, Roman Dziarski, Judith Hellman, Kevin Wilhelmsen and Joseph S. Lam.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.