Abstract and Applied Analysis

4.6k papers and 37.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.6k papers published in Abstract and Applied Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 37.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Abstract and Applied Analysis usually cover Applied Mathematics (2.0k papers), Numerical Analysis (1.2k papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (890 papers), Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (675 papers) and Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (598 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Abstract and Applied Analysis are Stevo Stević, Erdal Karapınar, Dumitru Băleanu, Ji‐Huan He, Adem Kılıçman, Abdon Atangana, João Marcos do Ó, Yu‐Ming Chu, Fathalla A. Rihan and Bashir Ahmad.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Abstract and Applied Analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Abstract and Applied Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Abstract and Applied Analysis.

Countries where authors publish in Abstract and Applied Analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Abstract and Applied Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Abstract and Applied Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Abstract and Applied Analysis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025