University of Southern California

147.6k papers receiving 5.8M citations

Peers

University of Southern California
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Aging 16.5k
  • Molecular Biology 418.0k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 130.3k
  • Physiology 166.3k
  • Oncology 141.0k
Replace University of California San Diego with:
University of California San Diego United States
University of California, Los Angeles United States
University of California, Irvine United States
Stanford University United States
University of California, Berkeley United States
University of California, Davis United States
University of Arizona United States
University of Utah United States
University of Washington United States
Arizona State University United States
University of Southern California relative to University of California San Diego United States University of California San Diego's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
University of California San Diego · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Southern California

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Southern California. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Southern California with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Southern California more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Southern California

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Southern California at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Southern California at the time of their publication.

About University of Southern California

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Southern California have published 200.1k papers, which have received a total of 8.5M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 303 papers in Aging, 1.3k papers in Hardware and Architecture, 6.8k papers in Surgery, 1.6k papers in Ophthalmology and 3.0k papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging on the topics of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1.4k papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1.1k papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (704 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (703 papers), Microstructure and mechanical properties (664 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (654 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (629 papers) and Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (587 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Aging (16.5k citations), Molecular Biology (418.0k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (130.3k citations), Physiology (166.3k citations) and Oncology (141.0k citations). Authors at University of Southern California collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Pacific Journal of Mathematics and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Some of University of Southern California's most productive authors include Terence G. Langdon, Peter A. Jones, Jerry M. Mendel, Richard Bellman, Kelvin J.A. Davies, Arieh Warshel, Mark E. Thompson, Pétros Ioannou, Jed A. Fuhrman and George Andrew Olah.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact