Duke University

149.8k papers receiving 7.4M citations

Peers

Duke University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Molecular Biology 1.4M
  • Developmental Biology 43.4k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 386.0k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 329.2k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 338.5k
Replace University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States
University of Pennsylvania United States
University of Pittsburgh United States
Johns Hopkins University United States
Emory University United States
Cornell University United States
Columbia University United States
Johns Hopkins Medicine United States
The Ohio State University United States
University of Virginia United States
Duke University relative to University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Duke University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Duke University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Duke University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Duke University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Duke University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Duke University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Duke University at the time of their publication.

About Duke University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Duke University have published 172.7k papers, which have received a total of 8.4M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 865 papers in Developmental Biology, 7.9k papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 665 papers in General Decision Sciences, 7.7k papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 21.3k papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1.8k papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (1.5k papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (1.4k papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1.4k papers), Plant and animal studies (1.4k papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (1.3k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1.3k papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1.2k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Molecular Biology (1.4M citations), Developmental Biology (43.4k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (386.0k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (329.2k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (338.5k citations). Authors at Duke University collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Science and American Heart Journal. Some of Duke University's most productive authors include Valarie A. Zeithaml, Adrian Bejan, Robert Jackson, Irwin Fridovich, David R. Smith, Nan Lin, Weitao Yang, Dan German Blazer, William H. Schlesinger and Campbell R. Harvey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact