Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows

1.3k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1992, received 1.3k indexed citations. Written by Florian Menter covering the research area of Applied Mathematics and Computational Mechanics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Mechanics (1.0k citations), Aerospace Engineering (714 citations) and Environmental Engineering (284 citations). Published in NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w9822903 →

Countries where authors are citing Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w9822903.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026