Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets
- Authors
- Tarun KhannaKrishna G. Palepu
- Journal
- Harvard business review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9784003 →Countries where authors are citing Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets
This map shows the geographic impact of Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets
This network shows the impact of Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets.
About Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets
This paper, published in 1997, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by Tarun Khanna and Krishna G. Palepu. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (1.1k citations), Accounting (1.0k citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (393 citations). Published in Harvard business review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9784003.