Feature Selection via Concave Minimization and Support Vector Machines

682 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1998, received 682 indexed citations. Written by Paul S. Bradley and O. L. Mangasarian covering the research area of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (358 citations), Artificial Intelligence (353 citations) and Computational Mechanics (150 citations). Published in International Conference on Machine Learning.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w9593887 →

Countries where authors are citing Feature Selection via Concave Minimization and Support Vector Machines

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feature Selection via Concave Minimization and Support Vector Machines. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feature Selection via Concave Minimization and Support Vector Machines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feature Selection via Concave Minimization and Support Vector Machines more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Feature Selection via Concave Minimization and Support Vector Machines

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Feature Selection via Concave Minimization and Support Vector Machines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Feature Selection via Concave Minimization and Support Vector Machines.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w9593887.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026