Correctional Populations in the United States, 2015

682 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2016, received 682 indexed citations. Written by Lauren E. Glaze covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (480 citations), Clinical Psychology (278 citations) and General Health Professions (263 citations). Published in University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w8612128 →

Countries where authors are citing Correctional Populations in the United States, 2015

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Correctional Populations in the United States, 2015. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Correctional Populations in the United States, 2015 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Correctional Populations in the United States, 2015 more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Correctional Populations in the United States, 2015

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Correctional Populations in the United States, 2015. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Correctional Populations in the United States, 2015.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w8612128.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026