Towards a sociology for childhood : thinking from children's lives
Impact in
- Education 267
Classified as
- Authors
- Berry Mayall
- Journal
- UCL Discovery (University College London)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9500053 →Countries where authors are citing Towards a sociology for childhood : thinking from children's lives
This map shows the geographic impact of Towards a sociology for childhood : thinking from children's lives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Towards a sociology for childhood : thinking from children's lives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Towards a sociology for childhood : thinking from children's lives more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Towards a sociology for childhood : thinking from children's lives
This network shows the impact of Towards a sociology for childhood : thinking from children's lives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Towards a sociology for childhood : thinking from children's lives.
About Towards a sociology for childhood : thinking from children's lives
This paper, published in 2002, received 563 indexed citations . Written by Berry Mayall covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (413 citations), Education (267 citations), Safety Research (98 citations), Clinical Psychology (84 citations) and General Health Professions (69 citations). Published in UCL Discovery (University College London).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9500053.