PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science.
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8927279 →Countries where authors are citing PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science.
This map shows the geographic impact of PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science.
This network shows the impact of PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science..
About PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science.
This paper, published in 2009, received 359 indexed citations . Written by Andreas Schleicher, Karin Zimmer and Juliet Evans covering the research area of Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (250 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (129 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (46 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8927279.