Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.
- Authors
- Charles C. BonwellJames Eison
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w89112605 →Countries where authors are citing Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.
This map shows the geographic impact of Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.
This network shows the impact of Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports..
About Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.
This paper, published in 1991, received 540 indexed citations . Written by Charles C. Bonwell and James Eison covering the research area of Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (383 citations), Media Technology (118 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (110 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w89112605.