The Dance of Change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in a learning organization
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w88907266 →Countries where authors are citing The Dance of Change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in a learning organization
This map shows the geographic impact of The Dance of Change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in a learning organization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Dance of Change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in a learning organization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Dance of Change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in a learning organization more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Dance of Change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in a learning organization
This network shows the impact of The Dance of Change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in a learning organization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Dance of Change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in a learning organization.
About The Dance of Change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in a learning organization
This paper, published in 1999, received 546 indexed citations . Written by Peter M. Senge, Art Kleiner, George Roth and Bryan Smith. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (230 citations), Strategy and Management (150 citations) and Education (108 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w88907266.