The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective
- Authors
- Leo van Lier
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w88257941 →Countries where authors are citing The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective
This map shows the geographic impact of The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective
This network shows the impact of The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective.
About The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective
This paper, published in 2004, received 674 indexed citations . Written by Leo van Lier covering the research area of Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cultural Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Language and Linguistics (459 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (358 citations) and Linguistics and Language (183 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w88257941.