Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice.
Impact in
- Authors
- Philip E. Tetlock
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8693123 →Countries where authors are citing Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice.
This map shows the geographic impact of Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice.
This network shows the impact of Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice..
About Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice.
This paper, published in 1985, received 475 indexed citations . Written by Philip E. Tetlock. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (136 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (122 citations), Accounting (116 citations), General Decision Sciences (84 citations) and Social Psychology (83 citations). Published in Research in Organizational Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8693123.