The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Deakin Research Online (Deakin University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w85387807 →Countries where authors are citing The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003
This map shows the geographic impact of The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003
This network shows the impact of The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003.
About The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003
This paper, published in 2007, received 959 indexed citations . Written by Stephen Begg, Theo Vos, Bridget M. Barker, Chris Stevenson and Alan D López covering the research area of Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Health and Emergency Medical Services. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (154 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (108 citations), Epidemiology (105 citations), Physiology (95 citations) and Health (67 citations). Published in Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w85387807.