Learning with technology : using computers as cognitive tools
- Authors
- David H. Jonassen
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w84392469 →Countries where authors are citing Learning with technology : using computers as cognitive tools
This map shows the geographic impact of Learning with technology : using computers as cognitive tools. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Learning with technology : using computers as cognitive tools with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Learning with technology : using computers as cognitive tools more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Learning with technology : using computers as cognitive tools
This network shows the impact of Learning with technology : using computers as cognitive tools. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Learning with technology : using computers as cognitive tools.
About Learning with technology : using computers as cognitive tools
This paper, published in 1996, received 496 indexed citations . Written by David H. Jonassen. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (335 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (248 citations) and Information Systems (95 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w84392469.