Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security

1.2k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2013, received 1.2k indexed citations. Written by A. van Huis, Joost Van Itterbeeck, Elly Mertens, Afton Halloran, Giulia Muir and Paul Vantomme covering the research area of Insect Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Insect Science (1.1k citations), Social Psychology (628 citations) and Genetics (294 citations). Published in Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w83536308 →

Countries where authors are citing Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w83536308.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026