Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia

1.2k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2020, received 1.2k indexed citations. Written by Songping Cui, Shuo Chen, Xiunan Li, Shi Liu and Feng Wang covering the research area of Internal Medicine, Oncology and Infectious Diseases. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Infectious Diseases (1.0k citations), Oncology (494 citations) and Internal Medicine (481 citations). Published in Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Countries where authors are citing Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/jth.14830.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026