Culture and Cognitive Development: Studies in Mathematical Understanding

431 indexed citations
published 1990
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w82849931 →

Countries where authors are citing Culture and Cognitive Development: Studies in Mathematical Understanding

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Culture and Cognitive Development: Studies in Mathematical Understanding. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Culture and Cognitive Development: Studies in Mathematical Understanding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Culture and Cognitive Development: Studies in Mathematical Understanding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Culture and Cognitive Development: Studies in Mathematical Understanding

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Culture and Cognitive Development: Studies in Mathematical Understanding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Culture and Cognitive Development: Studies in Mathematical Understanding.

About Culture and Cognitive Development: Studies in Mathematical Understanding

This paper, published in 1990, received 431 indexed citations . Written by Geoffrey B. Saxe covering the research area of Applied Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (287 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (184 citations) and Statistics and Probability (94 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w82849931.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026