A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).
- Authors
- Paul R. Pintrich
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w82272723 →Countries where authors are citing A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).
This map shows the geographic impact of A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).
This network shows the impact of A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)..
About A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).
This paper, published in 1991, received 2.5k indexed citations . Written by Paul R. Pintrich. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (1.4k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.2k citations) and Social Psychology (582 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w82272723.