Hyperthermia enables tumor-specific nanoparticle delivery: effect of particle size.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w81194961 →Countries where authors are citing Hyperthermia enables tumor-specific nanoparticle delivery: effect of particle size.
This map shows the geographic impact of Hyperthermia enables tumor-specific nanoparticle delivery: effect of particle size.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hyperthermia enables tumor-specific nanoparticle delivery: effect of particle size. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hyperthermia enables tumor-specific nanoparticle delivery: effect of particle size. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Hyperthermia enables tumor-specific nanoparticle delivery: effect of particle size.
This network shows the impact of Hyperthermia enables tumor-specific nanoparticle delivery: effect of particle size.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Hyperthermia enables tumor-specific nanoparticle delivery: effect of particle size..
About Hyperthermia enables tumor-specific nanoparticle delivery: effect of particle size.
This paper, published in 2000, received 525 indexed citations . Written by Garheng Kong, Rod D. Braun and Mark W. Dewhirst covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (350 citations), Biomaterials (303 citations) and Molecular Biology (177 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w81194961.