Levulinic Acid Biorefineries: New Challenges for Efficient Utilization of Biomass
- Journal
- ChemSusChem
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201501405 →Countries where authors are citing Levulinic Acid Biorefineries: New Challenges for Efficient Utilization of Biomass
This map shows the geographic impact of Levulinic Acid Biorefineries: New Challenges for Efficient Utilization of Biomass. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Levulinic Acid Biorefineries: New Challenges for Efficient Utilization of Biomass with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Levulinic Acid Biorefineries: New Challenges for Efficient Utilization of Biomass more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Levulinic Acid Biorefineries: New Challenges for Efficient Utilization of Biomass
This network shows the impact of Levulinic Acid Biorefineries: New Challenges for Efficient Utilization of Biomass. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Levulinic Acid Biorefineries: New Challenges for Efficient Utilization of Biomass.
About Levulinic Acid Biorefineries: New Challenges for Efficient Utilization of Biomass
This paper, published in 2016, received 525 indexed citations . Written by Filoklis D. Pileidis and Maria‐Magdalena Titirici covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (481 citations), Mechanical Engineering (141 citations) and Materials Chemistry (130 citations). Published in ChemSusChem.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201501405.