Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma
- Authors
- Prevention Program
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w81006952 →Countries where authors are citing Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma
This map shows the geographic impact of Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma
This network shows the impact of Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma.
About Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma
This paper, published in 1997, received 3.3k indexed citations . Written by Prevention Program covering the research area of Physiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Emergency Medical Services. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (2.6k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (2.0k citations) and General Health Professions (416 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w81006952.