Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention.
- Journal
- Psychological Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8041467 →Countries where authors are citing Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention.
This map shows the geographic impact of Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention.
This network shows the impact of Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention..
About Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention.
This paper, published in 1977, received 378 indexed citations . Written by Walter Schneider and Richard M. Shiffrin. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (220 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (104 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (93 citations). Published in Psychological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8041467.