Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Practices.
- Journal
- Teachers College Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7888995 →Countries where authors are citing Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Practices.
This map shows the geographic impact of Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Practices.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Practices. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Practices. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Practices.
This network shows the impact of Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Practices.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Practices..
About Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Practices.
This paper, published in 1995, received 571 indexed citations . Written by Thomas R. Guskey and A. Michael Huberman. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (512 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (112 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (54 citations). Published in Teachers College Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7888995.