Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading

697 indexed citations
published 1985

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w78459036 →

Countries where authors are citing Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading.

About Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading

This paper, published in 1985, received 697 indexed citations . Written by Richard C. Anderson. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental and Educational Psychology (477 citations), Education (445 citations) and Statistics and Probability (70 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w78459036.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026