Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups

658 indexed citations
published 2010
Journal
VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w77912864 →

Countries where authors are citing Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups.

About Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups

This paper, published in 2010, received 658 indexed citations . Written by Susan Aud, Mary A. Fox and Angelina KewalRamani covering the research area of Demography, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (424 citations), Sociology and Political Science (223 citations) and Social Psychology (107 citations). Published in VTechWorks (Virginia Tech).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w77912864.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026