Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development
- Authors
- James P. LantolfSteven L. Thorne
- Journal
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w77024125 →Countries where authors are citing Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development
This map shows the geographic impact of Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development
This network shows the impact of Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development.
About Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development
This paper, published in 2006, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by James P. Lantolf and Steven L. Thorne covering the research area of Language and Linguistics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Language and Linguistics (889 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (621 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (585 citations). Published in LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w77024125.