Body Mass Index variations: centiles from birth to 87 years.
Impact in
- Physiology 230
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w75397654 →Countries where authors are citing Body Mass Index variations: centiles from birth to 87 years.
This map shows the geographic impact of Body Mass Index variations: centiles from birth to 87 years.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Body Mass Index variations: centiles from birth to 87 years. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Body Mass Index variations: centiles from birth to 87 years. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Body Mass Index variations: centiles from birth to 87 years.
This network shows the impact of Body Mass Index variations: centiles from birth to 87 years.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Body Mass Index variations: centiles from birth to 87 years..
About Body Mass Index variations: centiles from birth to 87 years.
This paper, published in 1991, received 957 indexed citations . Written by Marie‐Françoise Rolland‐Cachera, Tim Cole, M Sempé, Jean Tichet, C Rossignol and Anne-Marie Charraud. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (359 citations), Physiology (230 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (227 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (204 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (125 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w75397654.