Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers
Impact in
- Education 354
Classified as
- Authors
- Anne Burns
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w74086632 →Countries where authors are citing Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers
This map shows the geographic impact of Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers
This network shows the impact of Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers.
About Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers
This paper, published in 1999, received 571 indexed citations . Written by Anne Burns covering the research area of Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (354 citations), Language and Linguistics (257 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (193 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (127 citations) and Information Systems (125 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w74086632.