Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Ages 23 and 24
Impact in
- Safety Research 357
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w72906858 →Countries where authors are citing Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Ages 23 and 24
This map shows the geographic impact of Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Ages 23 and 24. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Ages 23 and 24 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Ages 23 and 24 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Ages 23 and 24
This network shows the impact of Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Ages 23 and 24. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Ages 23 and 24.
About Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Ages 23 and 24
This paper, published in 2007, received 407 indexed citations . Written by Mark E. Courtney, Amy Dworsky and Jo Ann Lee covering the research area of Demography, Safety Research and Reproductive Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Safety Research (357 citations), Sociology and Political Science (188 citations), Clinical Psychology (168 citations), General Health Professions (151 citations) and Demography (49 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w72906858.