Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States.
Impact in
- Education 327
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w72063447 →Countries where authors are citing Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States.
This map shows the geographic impact of Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States.
This network shows the impact of Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States..
About Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States.
This paper, published in 2018, received 463 indexed citations . Written by Julia E. Seaman, I. Elaine Allen and Jeff Seaman covering the research area of Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (327 citations), Computer Science Applications (121 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (79 citations), Social Psychology (69 citations) and Information Systems (56 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w72063447.