Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS): analysis of forage quality
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w70406267 →Countries where authors are citing Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS): analysis of forage quality
This map shows the geographic impact of Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS): analysis of forage quality. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS): analysis of forage quality with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS): analysis of forage quality more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS): analysis of forage quality
This network shows the impact of Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS): analysis of forage quality. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS): analysis of forage quality.
About Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS): analysis of forage quality
This paper, published in 1989, received 332 indexed citations . Written by G. C. Marten, J. S. Shenk and Franklin E. Barton covering the research area of Plant Science, Animal Science and Zoology and Agronomy and Crop Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Agronomy and Crop Science (156 citations), Analytical Chemistry (113 citations) and Plant Science (78 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w70406267.