AOAC, 1970. Official Methods of Analysis of the
Impact in
- Food Science 303
- Plant Science 201
Classified as
- Authors
- Daftar Pustaka
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w69600894 →Countries where authors are citing AOAC, 1970. Official Methods of Analysis of the
This map shows the geographic impact of AOAC, 1970. Official Methods of Analysis of the. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by AOAC, 1970. Official Methods of Analysis of the with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AOAC, 1970. Official Methods of Analysis of the more than expected).
Fields of papers citing AOAC, 1970. Official Methods of Analysis of the
This network shows the impact of AOAC, 1970. Official Methods of Analysis of the. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the AOAC, 1970. Official Methods of Analysis of the.
About AOAC, 1970. Official Methods of Analysis of the
This paper, published in 2010, received 855 indexed citations . Written by Daftar Pustaka covering the research area of Anthropology and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Food Science (303 citations), Plant Science (201 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (200 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (123 citations) and Molecular Biology (100 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w69600894.