Love, Guilt and Reparation & Other Works, 1921-1945
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Melanie Klein
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w69595510 →Countries where authors are citing Love, Guilt and Reparation & Other Works, 1921-1945
This map shows the geographic impact of Love, Guilt and Reparation & Other Works, 1921-1945. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Love, Guilt and Reparation & Other Works, 1921-1945 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Love, Guilt and Reparation & Other Works, 1921-1945 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Love, Guilt and Reparation & Other Works, 1921-1945
This network shows the impact of Love, Guilt and Reparation & Other Works, 1921-1945. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Love, Guilt and Reparation & Other Works, 1921-1945.
About Love, Guilt and Reparation & Other Works, 1921-1945
This paper, published in 1975, received 302 indexed citations . Written by Melanie Klein covering the research area of History and Safety Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (148 citations), Sociology and Political Science (66 citations), Social Psychology (48 citations), Philosophy (41 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (38 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w69595510.