The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power
- Journal
- View
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w68130823 →Countries where authors are citing The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power
This map shows the geographic impact of The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power
This network shows the impact of The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power.
About The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power
This paper, published in 2019, received 381 indexed citations . Written by Michael A. Cusumano, Annabelle Gawer and David B. Yoffie. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (260 citations), Marketing (129 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (109 citations). Published in View.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w68130823.