The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development

678 indexed citations
published 1994
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w67999185 →

Countries where authors are citing The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development.

About The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development

This paper, published in 1994, received 678 indexed citations . Written by Mike Pedler, John Burgoyne and Tom Boydell. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (430 citations), Strategy and Management (298 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (121 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (76 citations) and Communication (74 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w67999185.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact