Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Jean Williams
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w67870312 →Countries where authors are citing Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance
This map shows the geographic impact of Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance
This network shows the impact of Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance.
About Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance
This paper, published in 2005, received 524 indexed citations . Written by Jean Williams covering the research area of Safety Research, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental and Educational Psychology (395 citations), Social Psychology (364 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (187 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (68 citations) and Applied Psychology (63 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w67870312.