Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team.

823 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1993, received 823 indexed citations. Written by Daniel L. Wann and Nyla R. Branscombe covering the research area of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Gender Studies (635 citations), Sociology and Political Science (613 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (270 citations). Published in International journal of sport psychology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w6746349 →

Countries where authors are citing Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w6746349.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026