Organizational Behavior : Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w66770112 →Countries where authors are citing Organizational Behavior : Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace
This map shows the geographic impact of Organizational Behavior : Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Organizational Behavior : Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organizational Behavior : Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Organizational Behavior : Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace
This network shows the impact of Organizational Behavior : Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Organizational Behavior : Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace.
About Organizational Behavior : Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace
This paper, published in 2008, received 639 indexed citations . Written by Jason A. Colquitt, Jeffery A. LePine and Michael J. Wesson. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (352 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (253 citations), Education (239 citations), Strategy and Management (56 citations) and Social Psychology (55 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w66770112.