Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement

642 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2012, received 642 indexed citations. Written by Wolfram Bremser, Robert Kaarls, Rüdiger Kaus, Bertil Magnusson, Piotr Robouch, Matthias Rösslein, Veen Aa van der, Mark P. Walsh, Wolfhard Wegscheider and Roger Wood covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications, Biomedical Engineering and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Food Science (190 citations), Analytical Chemistry (183 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (97 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w62036162 →

Countries where authors are citing Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w62036162.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026