TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHER KNOWLEDGE

475 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2006, received 475 indexed citations. Written by Punya Mishra and Matthew J. Koehler covering the research area of Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (363 citations), Information Systems (157 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (99 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w61196563 →

Countries where authors are citing TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHER KNOWLEDGE

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHER KNOWLEDGE. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHER KNOWLEDGE with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHER KNOWLEDGE more than expected).

Fields of papers citing TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHER KNOWLEDGE

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHER KNOWLEDGE. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHER KNOWLEDGE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w61196563.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026