Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause

1.2k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2004, received 1.2k indexed citations. Written by Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (762 citations), Marketing (558 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (263 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w59787728 →

Countries where authors are citing Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w59787728.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026