Basic concepts of enriched category theory
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- G. M. Kelly
- Journal
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w5906594 →Countries where authors are citing Basic concepts of enriched category theory
This map shows the geographic impact of Basic concepts of enriched category theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Basic concepts of enriched category theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Basic concepts of enriched category theory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Basic concepts of enriched category theory
This network shows the impact of Basic concepts of enriched category theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Basic concepts of enriched category theory.
About Basic concepts of enriched category theory
This paper, published in 1982, received 638 indexed citations . Written by G. M. Kelly covering the research area of Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics and Geometry and Topology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mathematical Physics (395 citations), Geometry and Topology (348 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (217 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (213 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (196 citations). Published in Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w5906594.